Other Possible Engagement Contributions

3.3.1 – Initial Research Pathway

My initial interest in SLA 3D printing within the context of civil engineering began after learning about its potential to revolutionize construction methods, particularly in producing precise and complex structural components. I started by researching how stereolithography (SLA) works, focusing on its accuracy, material properties, and limitations compared to other 3D printing methods like FDM and SLS. I used Google Scholar and academic databases to find articles about SLA applications in civil structures, especially in fabricating scale models, structural prototypes, and architectural details.

I also used ChatGPT to generate questions and keywords such as "SLA 3D printing concrete molds," "additive manufacturing in civil engineering," and "material testing in SLA applications." It helped me explore areas I hadn't considered, such as the environmental impact and scalability of SLA printing in construction. One of the most helpful sources was a journal article discussing SLA's use in printing high-precision molds for concrete casting, which provided technical insights and case studies.

This initial research allowed me to shape the project’s direction by understanding the technology's strengths, like precision and surface finish, and the challenges in applying it on a large scale in civil engineering.

3.3.2 – Contributions to the Team

Throughout the project, I was actively involved in all key stages, from topic selection to final submission. Initially, I participated in the discussion to select a suitable topic and helped plan our project timeline. I used ChatGPT to generate ideas and shared relevant suggestions with the group, which helped spark meaningful discussions and refine our proposal direction.

During the proposal phase, I took responsibility for analyzing the problem and proposing feasible solutions. I conducted additional research to support our findings and collaborated with teammates to ensure our individual sections were aligned in clarity and tone. I also played a key role in editing the report for grammar, coherence, and proper referencing.

For our presentation, I contributed to slide design and participated in a mock session, offering constructive feedback to enhance delivery. I revised my own presentation section multiple times and supported a teammate who lacked confidence in public speaking by helping with scripting and rehearsal. After receiving feedback, I made targeted improvements to emphasize key points and pacing.

Finally, I worked closely with the team to polish the final report, ensuring it was cohesive and met all requirements.

3.3.3 – Expected Participation Mark

I believe a fair participation mark for me would be around 80%. I consistently attended all classes and actively contributed to group discussions and project work outside of class. I took on responsibilities in both the research and proposal stages and made sure to communicate effectively with my teammates throughout the process.

However, I recognize there were areas where I could improve. I was occasionally late to class, and during some in-class sessions, I was more reserved and less vocal compared to others. Despite this, I stayed attentive, took notes, and followed the discussions closely.

Moving forward, I hope to improve my punctuality and become more active in class discussions to fully engage with the learning environment.

3.3.4 – Oral Pitch

In the oral pitch for our timetable scheduling system proposal, I presented the introduction and core features of our solution. I highlighted how the current system causes frustration due to repeated logins and delayed updates. I then explained how our solution, a seamless, integrated calendar, would improve accessibility with real-time updates, cross-platform compatibility, and a user-friendly interface.

To prepare, I wrote and practiced my script several times, incorporating feedback from teammates to improve clarity and pacing. I coordinated closely with the group to ensure a consistent message, aiming to deliver the pitch with confidence and impact

3.3.5 – Responding to Questions

During our presentation, I answered a question about whether our scheduling system would replace the current one at SIT. I explained that our goal was not to replace it completely but to improve the user experience by offering a more convenient and updated interface. I said it could work together with the current system by linking data and making access easier for students.

I also responded to some course-related questions during class discussions, especially when we talked about examples of good user-centered design. I shared my thoughts and gave feedback to others, which helped me think more critically.

If there were questions I was not sure about, I stayed calm and either shared what I knew or let a teammate answer. These moments helped me become more confident when speaking and responding to questions.

Critical Reflection

Module Learning

At the beginning of the module, I set two main goals: to build confidence in public speaking and to strengthen my critical thinking skills. Reflecting on my progress, I believe I have made steady improvements in both areas, though there is still room for further development.

In terms of public speaking, I started the course feeling uncertain, especially when responding to spontaneous questions. I often struggled with nervousness during presentations, particularly under pressure. However, through the mock presentations and class discussions, I gradually became more comfortable speaking in front of others. Practicing in smaller groups helped me organize my thoughts better and respond more calmly when asked questions. I also paid attention to feedback from my instructor and peers and applied their suggestions to improve my pacing and delivery. While I still occasionally feel anxious, I now approach presentations with more confidence and a clearer structure.

Regarding critical thinking, the course has helped me learn how to analyze problems from multiple perspectives. Previously, I tended to focus on technical solutions without fully questioning the assumptions behind them. Now, I am more comfortable challenging ideas, evaluating sources critically, and building arguments with supporting evidence. Using tools like ChatGPT also helped me expand my thinking by prompting alternative viewpoints and helping me refine my arguments.

To continue developing, I plan to participate more actively in group discussions and reflect more deeply on feedback. I will also engage with case studies and engineering scenarios to practice applying critical thinking in practical contexts. These steps will help me grow further as a communicator and thinker.

Project Learning

The group project gave me a valuable opportunity to reflect on my learning, particularly in the areas of teamwork, research writing, and presentation. Early on, I helped coordinate our topic selection and schedule. As someone who enjoys organizing tasks and keeping things on track, I found myself naturally taking the lead in planning. I also contributed heavily to the research and proposal writing process by suggesting ideas, reviewing drafts, and ensuring our arguments were clear and supported.

Working with teammates showed me how diverse perspectives can improve the quality of a project. I learned to listen more actively and to be open to feedback, even when it meant adjusting my own ideas. This helped me build better collaboration skills and improved the overall effectiveness of our team. I also found that I was able to support others not just by contributing content but also by helping clarify ideas and polishing the final draft for cohesion and consistency.

One major area of growth was my presentation ability. In the past, I struggled with confidence during public speaking, as I mentioned in my initial goal. But through our mock presentations and team rehearsals, I started to feel more at ease. I practiced not only my part of the script but also how to respond to questions more calmly. Receiving feedback from the instructor after the mock session helped me focus on key areas, such as slowing down and making eye contact. These small changes made a big difference in how I delivered my final presentation.

This project also changed the way I view learning. I used to think of learning as something individual, but I now see how much growth happens through collaboration. I have learned that being flexible, open-minded, and willing to revise ideas is just as important as technical knowledge. These insights will stay with me as I take on future academic and professional challenges.